We
are responsible for ensuring that all materials used and shared are
accessible to everyone — even when those materials are created or hosted
by third-party publishers or external websites. This page explains how
to evaluate third-party content, request accessible alternatives, and
provide equivalent access when accessibility gaps exist.
Many commonly used publishers and content providers (e.g., Pearson, McGraw-Hill, Cengage) offer accessibility statements and may provide accessible versions of their materials upon request. However, accessibility can vary by product, format, or platform, and faculty should not assume that all publisher-provided content is fully accessible without review.
Faculty must assess any critical instructional content that directs students to external platforms, files, or websites and confirm that the content is accessible to all students. If accessibility cannot be verified or barriers are identified, faculty are responsible for ensuring that an accessible, equivalent alternative is available.
In Summary:
Review the publisher’s accessibility documentation for the specific product being used
Report accessibility barriers directly to the publisher or platform provider
Document requests and responses related to accessibility support
Note: Publishers are responsible for providing accessible versions of their materials, but we often must request those versions to initiate the process.
Clarity: Content that is considered critical that must meet accessibility standards or have an accessible alternative is anything that is required to complete assignments, assessments, or understand core course concepts.
If you have a publisher you're using that you'd like additional accessibility review of, please reach out to accessibility@cumberland.edu.
Contact the publisher or their accessibility or customer service department to request an accessible file or alternative format.
Search for the same article, case study, or research content available as a webpage and provide that link as an accessible alternative
If the above are not available, seek permission from the content owner to create an accessible alternative
Consider library-licensed materials that have already been vetted for accessibility
Explore open-access or openly licensed alternatives that meet accessibility standards and support the same learning objectives
When an accessible version is not immediately available, faculty may need to provide supplementary materials that convey the same information and instructional value. These materials must be equivalent substitutes.
Examples include:
Text-based summaries of key concepts or findings
Detailed descriptions of images, charts, or diagrams included in the original content
Alternative readings, captioned videos, or accessible datasets covering the same learning goals
If
there is a high-priority course document that cannot meet the
accessibility standards outlined above, faculty may request support from
Accessibility Services. Preferably, filling out the request form found on the website.